Take Action 2019: Learn more and take action on Conscience Rights in your province.
Canada has legalized euthanasia and assisted suicide under certain circumstances. These practices deliberately and intentionally cause a person’s death.
All human life is precious. Life is a gift from God for us to respect and protect through all its stages. Each person’s life has worth, regardless of their age or ability, because they are made in the image of God and loved by him. This belief in the sanctity of all human life compels us to completely oppose euthanasia and assisted suicide.
God calls us to care for those who are vulnerable, including those who are ill or near the end of life. The EFC supports palliative care as a compassionate response that supports and cares for those who are suffering or terminally ill.
Provinces are developing policies for how they will process requests for assisted death under the new legislation. Most provinces outside of Ontario are finding ways to protect the conscience of healthcare workers. The EFC supports the Call for Conscience campaign
which offers specific information for each province and calls citizens to action as needed. The EFC is a founding member of the Coalition for HealthCARE and Conscience which operates this campaign.
Ontario has adopted a policy that doctors must provide effective referrals even for procedures that violate their deeply held beliefs. This means they must refer a patient seeking euthanasia or assisted suicide to a physician or nurse practitioner who is willing to help end the patient’s life.
The Fraser Health Authority in B.C. is requiring euthanasia be offered at hospices but several are refusing and various politicians and church leaders are speaking out to say that hospices should not be forced. Ontario may require some long term care facilities to allow assisted death on their premises.
The EFC wrote to the Alberta minister of health in January 2019 asking her government to continue to protect faith-based medical institutions
from pressure to start requiring them to allow euthanasia or assisted suicide on their premises.
The federal government commissioned an arms-length body, the Canadian Council of Academies, to study extending access to euthanasia and assisted suicide to:
- mature minors
- those for whom mental illness is the sole underlying medical condition, and
- those who wish to use advance directives.
These studies reported back to Parliament in December 2018. The EFC made a submission
Oct. 2, 2017 that argues against expansion (includes a link to the Parliamentary reports).
Two challenges of the new law were launched by groups who believe it is too restrictive and should not be limited to those whose natural death is reasonably foreseeable.
: The EFC was granted intervener status in one such case in British Columbia, the Lamb case
, but in Sept. 2019 that case was adjourned indefinitely.
: On Sept. 11, 2019, Quebec Superior Court Judge Christine Baudouin struck down the requirement in federal law that a person’s death be “reasonably foreseeable” to qualify for euthanasia. She also struck down a similar clause in Quebec’s euthanasia law that requires an illness be terminal. The judge also gave the federal and Quebec governments six months to amend their laws. The federal and provincial governments have 30 days to appeal the decision. See the Oct. 1 EFC blog post
, letter to the Minister of Justice
asking that this decision be appealed, and a sample letter
which you can also send before the appeal deadline of Oct. 11.
In 2016, Canada legalized euthanasia and assisted suicide under certain circumstances.
The Supreme Court of Canada ruled in the Carter
case, in 2015, that there should be an exemption to the blanket ban on physician-assisted dying. In essence, the court allowed patients with a “grievous and irremediable medical condition” to be able to ask a physician to end their lives, without penalty.
The EFC was an intervener in the Carter
case and argued that the court should uphold the sanctity of human life. Respect for life is a core principle in Canadian society. (See the EFC’s summary and commentary on the decision, as well as legal arguments, at TheEFC.ca/Carter
Federal and provincial governments set up hearings on how to respond to the Carter
decision. A provincial-territorial advisory group studying the issues recommended wide access to assisted death, including access for mature minors. The Federal Panel on Legislative Options found widespread support for palliative care, in spite of diverse opinions on physician-assisted dying. A special joint parliamentary committee recommended that Canada allow very expansive access to assisted death.
The federal government introduced Bill C-14 in April 2016. This bill created an exemption to the Criminal Code
’s blanket ban on euthanasia and assisted suicide for competent adults who are 18 years or older; with a serious or incurable illness, disease or disability; in an advanced state of irreversible decline; and for whom death is “reasonably foreseeable.”
The legislation included some safeguards, such as informed consent and a voluntary request made in the presence of witnesses after a palliative care consultation on treatment options.
The EFC argued against legalizing euthanasia and assisted suicide in submissions to both the provincial/territorial and federal consultations, and to the House of Commons and Senate committees. The EFC urged the government, if it was going to go ahead with legislation, to include the strictest limits possible, as well as strong, specific conscience protection for healthcare providers and support for palliative care. Some of the EFC’s recommendations are reflected in the legislation, such as an affirmation of the freedom of conscience and a required palliative care consultation.
The federal government passed Bill C-14, legalizing euthanasia and assisted suicide in June 2016. Quebec’s Medical Aid in Dying Act
, which includes euthanasia for those at the end of life, took effect in December 2015.
Euthanasia and assisted suicide deliberately and intentionally cause a person’s death. Refusing treatment or allowing death to occur from natural causes is not euthanasia. Giving pain medication to ease suffering during a terminal illness, even if the secondary effect is to shorten life, is also not euthanasia. Euthanasia includes the intent to hasten or cause death.
How does our faith shape our response to these issues? God calls us to care for our neighbour and to seek the well-being of our country.
We are stewards of this life, but it belongs to God.
Christians believe God calls us to live the life He has given us. We do not need to accept medical treatment, but it is not for us to choose the timing of our death.
Fear and despair often fuel a request for assisted death.
Many people who are ill or at the end of life are concerned about being a burden and may be afraid of what lies ahead. The compassionate response is to support and encourage them, to provide high quality palliative care, not to end their lives.
God calls us to care for the vulnerable.
To love our neighbour is the second greatest commandment, after loving God. Jesus’ parable of the Good Samaritan teaches that our neighbour is anyone who is in need.
In both the Old and New Testaments, the people of Israel and followers of Jesus were commanded to care for the foreigner, the widow, the orphan and the poor. Another parable tells us that when we serve the vulnerable in our society, we are serving Christ (Matthew 25:34-36).
We must care for those:
All human life is precious.
- Living with a disability or serious illness
- Struggling to receive proper medical care
- In despair, believing their lives aren’t worth living
- Afraid of losing capacity or afraid they may suffer
- Needing pain control or support, without quality palliative care
Each person’s life has inherent worth and dignity because we are created by God, made in his image and loved by him. Euthanasia and assisted suicide fundamentally devalue human life. They communicate that some lives are not worth living, that people with disabilities or illness are better off dead.
Allowing euthanasia and assisted suicide shifts our medical system from a presumption for life to one in which a patient, amid scarce resources, may feel the need to justify not choosing death. Causing someone to justify their continued care and their very existence denies the dignity we affirm in us all.
We must affirm human worth and dignity with compassion.
The suffering experienced by many living with illness or disability does demand a response. We believe the compassionate response is to support and encourage people who are vulnerable, to provide high quality palliative care, not to end their lives.
- For opportunities to care for and support our neighbours who suffer
- For those who feel life is not worth living and for those who are suffering
- For our culture to be life-affirming
- For all of us to recognize that God is sovereign, and that autonomy is not the ultimate good
- For strength and wisdom for health care providers and institutions
Care for the vulnerable around you:
- Reach out to people who are depressed or struggling, living with a terminal illness or a disability
- Offer practical, tangible help to seniors and those with a terminal illness or disability, and their caregivers, by developing or joining existing programs, such as Meals on Wheels
- Support palliative care and hospice programs with your time and/or resources
Ask for change:
- Pray for your Member of Parliament and your MPP/MLA
- Call or write your elected representatives to ask for:
- increased support and funding for palliative care
- the strictest possible limits and safeguards on euthanasia and assisted suicide
- strong, specific conscience protection for healthcare providers and institutions
- Share what you’re learning on social media